Jump to content

Talk:She Wolf (Shakira song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 21:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info box
  • Genres should be alphabetical
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • Link Columbian
  • The former duo → They aren't a duo, that implies that they are a pair who always work together.
  • translation titled → translation of the song titled
  • Commercially, the single was a huge success. → Bias, I'd remove this altogether.
  • component → Remove.
  • ability to dance → dancing ability
 Done All --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Background and composition
  • Shakira said that ""She Wolf" came to me very mysteriously. I was → Shakira said that the idea for "She Wolf" came to her "very mysteriously", revealing "I was
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Critical reception
  • a very positive → Slightly bias
  • the song "unique", and concluded that the song → the song... the song. Avoid repetition, and throughout this section.
 Done All --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Music video
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Charts

Tables should be marked up for access and should have the shaded column.

I couldn't get this? Can you please clarify more? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Year ends should be two separate tables.

Well they are pretty much separated? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Refs
  • 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 51 shouldn't have italics.
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • 95 and 96 are not formatted.
 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Status

On hold.  — aron 10:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing.  — aron 16:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.