Talk:Shawn Hogan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

uploading vs. downloading

The MPAA is accusing Hogan of making Meet the Fockers "available for download."

This is "uploading" or distributing -- not "downloading." That he owns a copy is not only irrelevent as a defense but may point to the source of the distributed file.

I have no sympathy nor do I support the MPAA and RIAA position but in fact in the US not a single person has ever been sued by the RIAA or MPAA for downloading protected content. On any given day any (or every) web surfer, or recepient of email may be "downloadng protected content. There is no method of proving intent.

The MPAA and RIAA are happy to continue the confusion as their aim is to chill downloaders as well as downloaders, but wikipedia needs to be precise.

Again, in Hogan's case the precise accusation is "making available for download."IDD55 01:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]