Talk:Sharovipteryx

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sharovipteryx article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology High‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Sharovipteryx is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ankles

I'm just wondering: were the ankles of Sharovipteryx crurotarsal, or mesotarsal? Because if they were mesotarsal, then wouldn't that point towards them having evolved into pterosaurs?71.63.17.46 (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know what defines a mesotarsal or a crurotarsal, but if Sharovipteryx is missing link in between Pterosaurs and more basal Archosaurs, why are its wings on its back legs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.138.213.207 (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jet Rex

F22 Raptor had Variable wing vector, and was a powerful strike fighter... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.184.91 (talk) 02:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

that is nice to know, but how is that related to a gliding lizard?--50.138.213.207 (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link okay?

Would the following link fit within WP guidelines as an External link -- or would it be too "original research"?

The Aerodynamics of Sharovipteryx – the Hind Wing Glider - pterosaurheresies at WordPress; March 12, 2012

~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 08:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i personally do not think that is okay, the Pterosaur heresies is owned by David Peters and he seems to defy common consensus because its funny or something. David Peters had faked evidence and depicts pterosaurs as Bipeds, which was simply Not possible for them to do that.--50.138.213.207 (talk) 04:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biased in favor of Peters?

It might be just me. But it seems like the article is written with a strong bias towards David Peters' hypotheses and not a more balanced "consensus" view of Sharovipteryx mirabilis. Does anybody else see this? 65.96.242.22 (talk) 03:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that not much has been published on this species, so Peters' stuff makes up a lot of the literature and isn't therefore a "minority" opinion. I've tried to balance it out a little by better organizing the sections. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dimensions

Not specified anywhere 147.235.213.191 (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]