Talk:Sharon Lee (writer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Working on adding some good sources. This author is clearly notable, given that she was on the board of the SFWA for half a dozen years, including stints as President and Executive Director (sourced in the main article). I've added some sources to help document her 30+ year career as a published author. I'll add a section on awards won as well. Hopefully, This will move it to a solid status. Recommend changing from a notability tag to one of the sources for profile improvement. catseyes (talk) 12:57, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Linked material

Also as she appears as a guest of honor at more than one convention, an award winner or nominee more than once, and multiple other citations, she should have more external material linked to her. Doryllis (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think we may have achieved adequate sourcing. Since I'm the one that added the bulk of it I'd appreciate someone else reviewing for tag removal. catseyes (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking in my melanti as a Wikipedia editor, I'd be happier if the "references" included fewer items from her own publisher, and more from impartial reliable sources such as Locus and Publishers Weekly. --Orange Mike | Talk 06:33, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. About a third of the references are links back to their listings. I hadn't even paid attention to where they went when those were added. I was just happy someone else was participating. I'll see if I can find some reviews to replace some of those with. catseyes (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And after all that work I did to find links to reviews instead of to the publisher's site, someone has gone and put links to the publisher back in. I don't have the time to go back through and grab the stuff that should be kept, since they also did some other stuff, and it's going to have to be picked through. catseyes (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liaden Wiki

I added the Liaden Wiki to the External links section and it was removed based on the WP:ELNO guidelines. I'm guessing that was in accordance with item 12 of WP:LINKSTOAVOID. I think that the wiki falls under the exceptions to the guideline, but would like other opinions. catseyes (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, wikis (including this one) do not fall in the category of reliable sources. We need links to publications with editorial staff, peer review, fact-checking, etc. This is not optional: necessity compels! --Orange Mike | Talk 17:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]