Talk:Sharad Panday

Sharad Panday has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 23, 2017. (Reviewed version).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Sharad Panday appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sharad Panday was an early exponent of bloodless open heart surgery in India?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sharad Panday.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra.

Formatting

Research papers should be in quotes; books are in italics. Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sharad Panday/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) 08:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to pick it up for a review! :) Adityavagarwal (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any particular reason of having citations in lead?

Done Have removed citations from lead.

"pioneers" and "pioneered" slightly puffy. :P

Done Have re-worded "pioneers" and "pioneered"

If it is Don Bosco High School, Matunga, you could link Don Bosco High School.

Done Have linked Don Bosco High School.

Could you add when he received the "Ontario Heart Foundation fellowship"?

Done Have added the year he received the fellowship.

"The hospital was one of the very few places in India where heart surgery was performed, and thus Panday performed hundreds of open heart surgeries" why is the "and thus" part here? Are the two parts of the sentences linked somehow?
"was chief" if there was only one chief position, you could fix it to "was the chief".

Done Have added the chief.

Link Nanavati hospital.

I think Nanavati hospital is linked.

We could have the publications as a list.

Looks good to me, and this is all I have to say! Adityavagarwal (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have tried to address most of it. Please do let me know if its adequate. Thank you FITINDIA 19:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fitindia Just two more comments left. The list and a tweaking thing. If you have any difficulty, ask me, I could do them for you!

Adityavagarwal, have done the list could you please help me with the tweak. Thank you 19:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fitindia One last thing I would say is to add citations to publications, as every bit of information has to be supported by sources (reliable)! Adityavagarwal (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adityavagarwal

Done Please do have a look. Thank you FITINDIA 20:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short but interesting article, good to go! Adityavagarwal (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: