Talk:Shannen Says/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this one for a review - won't be till tomorrow though. Miyagawa (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And no worries, take your time :-) Aoba47 (talk) 22:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then typically I forget I've grabbed this for a review and don't get started for a couple of days more. Anyway, let's get the ball rolling now.

Concept and development: "similar filming and production style done in" would flow better as "similar filming and production style seen in"

Done. That is a lot better. Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly bridezilla goes to a disambig page. I would have loved if there had been an article for that.

Agreed, I am surprised that an article was not made for this already. Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filming and cast: "that the show would show all aspects" - is there an alternative word you could use instead of one of the "show"'s? Perhaps "series" in the first instance or "demonstrate" in the second?

Done. I am always bad with repetition so thank you for the catch. Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filing and cast: "The wedding took place and was filmed on October 15, 2011. Production started in August, with the release date originally set for January." I would simply swap the order of those sentences to make it slightly more chronological.

Done. Thank you for the catch. I just added that in there recently so I did not think about the chronological order. Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes: I take it the other episodes didn't get a mention in TV by the Numbers, hence no ratings?

Unfortunately, I cannot find any other information about the ratings for this show. Considering it was a small show on a smaller network, I should not be surprised, but I will check again in the future to see if I can dig up more information on this. Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception: Capitalise the "T" in The Huffington Post.

Done Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References: Typo on Realscrean.com

Done Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cite #14 + #35 - MTV or MTV News?

Done Both are MTV News. I have made the adjustments.

You can link to TV by the Numbers and Zap2it. I wouldn't say normally, but then it'll match the other citations.

Done Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cite #32: Life & Style should be linked to, and in italics.

Done Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cite 34: Link to The Huffington Post and AOL.

Done Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, I think that's everything. Placing this one on hold for the normal seven days. Nice job! Miyagawa (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Miyagawa: Thank you for the review! This will probably be my last GAN for a while so you don't have to worry about me forcing you to read another silly article lol. I have addressed all your comments above. Thank you again, and hope you are having a great day so far. Aoba47 (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Great, I'm happy to promote. Don't worry too much about those ratings - I had a hard time finding reliably sourced Star Trek ratings, and even now I can't find the end of year average for one of the seasons of Enterprise. Miyagawa (talk) 16:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Miyagawa: Thank you for the review as always! Ratings are a very tricky thing to get a hold off oddly enough, especially reliably sourced ratings. Aoba47 (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]