Talk:Shakman Decrees

Rewriting Needed

This article needs to be rewritten, preferably by an editor with some understanding of municipal law and politics. For just a few examples,

a decree is a judicial order, not a law;
a decree is issued by a judge, not enacted;
the lede is uninformative and doesn't even identify Michael Shakman clearly;
there are numerous errors of grammar, syntax, diction, and style; and
the citations are merely blanket-references to entire works, without page numbers or other specific information.

The related article, Michael L. Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, suffers from many of the same faults as this, and should be rewritten as well, and probably combined with this article. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 20:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shakman Decrees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130302211059/http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/18036773-452/is-city-ready-to-be-free-of-shakman-case.html to http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/18036773-452/is-city-ready-to-be-free-of-shakman-case.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Hugh (talk) 17:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]