Talk:Shakereh Khaleeli

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Karnataka Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I think the grammar is pretty good now, so I removed the copyedit tag. Sad article. Peasreach77 (talk) 06:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of encyclopedic treatment of the subject

The article is loaded with emotive sentences and phrases e.g "He lived in Bangalore like a king" and "When the murder was disclosed, it shook the nation.", which smacks of a less-than-encyclopedic and neutral approach to the subject matter. Also, depending on perspective, the article could be deemed to contain unnecessary details (about Khaleeli's first husband), or to be incomplete (no mention of the circumstances that led to the murder, if available). This article needs to be rewritten in order to meet encyclopedic standards. Knaveknight (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]