Talk:Shah Jalal Dargah
Appearance
A fact from Shah Jalal Dargah appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that according to local legend, the catfish that inhabit the reservoir of the Shah Jalal Dargah (grave pictured) are the cursed and reincarnated soldiers of Gour Govinda? Source: "Also nearby is a pond full of catfish said to be the soldiers of defeated Hindu king Gaurgovinda cursed by Shah Jalal to be reborn over and over again as catfish." Knight, Lisa I. (2014). Contradictory Lives: Baul Women in India and Bangladesh. Oxford University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-19-939684-9
- Reviewed: First DYK nomination, not required
Created by Alivardi (talk). Self-nominated at 21:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC).
-
- Article: Created within seven days, is long enough (1426 prose words >> 1500 characters), and meets policy (copyvio checked via Earwig's Copyvio Detector, appears neutral, and has quite solid academic citations). Some of the citations are non-English, but all the English sources I checked are of quite high quality, and the cited statement for the hook is backed up by an English academic text. I feel comfortable to AGF on the non-English sources for the purpose of this DYK, and this does not affect the hook statement, which is supported by a high-quality English academic source.
- Hook: less than 200 characters, intriguing, backed up by the original source and in the article, and unrelated to living people. Formatting looks good.
- QPQ: unnecessary, as this is a first submission. Jlevi (talk) 02:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps hold for November and Wikipedia Asian Month? --evrik (talk) 03:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review and yeah postponing until Asian Month sounds like a good idea. Do you know how I would go about doing so?
Alivardi (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)- I've moved it to the November holding area. But the Notable burials section is completely unsourced, which does not meet Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I was trying to use a similar format to this article, but I guess it wasn't the best example to follow. I've now added the citations. Thanks for the heads up.
Alivardi (talk) 21:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Restoring tick per Jlevi's review. Yoninah (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Adding colorful, freely-licensed image. Yoninah (talk) 13:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I was trying to use a similar format to this article, but I guess it wasn't the best example to follow. I've now added the citations. Thanks for the heads up.
- Thank you for the review and yeah postponing until Asian Month sounds like a good idea. Do you know how I would go about doing so?
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Bangladesh articles
- Low-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- C-Class Mosque-related articles
- Mosques task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles