Talk:Sexual economics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 September 2019 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Limitations and criticism

It would be useful to add a section that discusses the limitations of sexual economics theory and includes some of the criticism against it. Alan Islas (talk) 06:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is low quality, and makes many vague, unsubstantiated, ideological claims Andyforbes123 (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page move to 'Sexual economics theory' proposal

This page, after the first sentence, is known in reliable sources as 'Sexual economics theory', not sexual economics in general. A specific Baumeister theory, not a general concept. That's what the lede citation is. The lede citation was the first study in this field, but because it was titled sexual economics doesn't mean that's what reliable sources refer to it as. The first sentence is disconnected from the rest of the page and uncited, as the main citation in the lede is about a specific theory ("SET"), not all sexual economics. There's dozens of sources on the theory at this point, just listing a few. The academic ones point to the original Baumeister article usually.

2600:8806:0:C2:9528:DD17:734A:B889 (talk) 11:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]