Talk:Sexual desire and intimate relationships

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Sexology and sexuality High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Unneeded article

I just noted that this article is essentially an essay and not needed when we have a Sexual desire and Intimate relationship article. Per WP:Content fork, some merging needs to take place here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then again, perhaps since this article is mostly about sexual matters, and the Sexual desire article is supposed to focus more so on sexual desire than on relationships, and since the Intimate relationship article is not just about sexual intimacy (but other forms of intimacy as well), having this article is better than merging parts of it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your first comment that this article is unneeded. The scope of this article is redundant, making it a content fork. According to the history, it was written basically all at once by a user who edited nothing else in 2012. I do believe it should be merged, as there does appear to be worthwhile content. As for your second comment, any number of "X and Y" articles could theoretically be written, but we generally discuss how things relate to other things in singularly focused articles. -Crossroads- (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Psychoanalysis

I don't understand why this is tagged as part of the psychoanalysis series. Psychoanalysis, or a psychoanalytic view of the topic, is not mentioned. 81.98.48.160 (talk) 22:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]