Talk:Sex Industry Network
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sex Industry Network article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Is it me or does this sound like it was cut and pasted from a brochure? -Postcard Cathy (talk)
- Postcard Cathy Do you have any suggestions on how to make it sound less like a brochure? -(Dominique Kohoron (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC))
- The very last sentence is an example of what I am thinking of. Personally, I am a "as few words as possible" kind of person, in a simple and direct style. But that is just me! -Postcard Cathy (talk)
Categories:
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Sex work articles
- Mid-importance Sex work articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles