This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors articles
@Ichthyovenator: so, bringing the issue here, I don't think "Valerius Severus" is very good because the omission of only his first name seems arbitrary. A google scholar search for "Valerius Severus" shows no instance of this emperor being called that specifically over the full "Flavius Valerius Severus", and the search returns other people called "Valerius Severus" as well. He seems to be commonly known as Severus simply, and although the numeral II appears to be used by numismatists mostly (for example), it makes sense for an emperor and it's what the DIR and Kienast's Romische Kaisertabelle call him. The other alternative is moving the page to the subject's full name, but I lean toward Severus II. Avilich (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree. At this point in time, "Flavius" had not yet become the almost title-like honorific name it was to become so not using it while using the rest is arbitrary. His coinage, as it either abbreviates or omits Flavius and Valerius, suggests that he was also often known by his contemporaries as just "Severus". Given that titling the page just 'Severus' or 'Severus (emperor)' doesn't work since it is not precise enough, Severus II is most appropriate given that its a name used by both numismatists and historians (at least to some degree; and in both cases seemingly to a greater degree than "Valerius Severus"). Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We agree then, fantastic. But it seems "Severus II" was merged here and so I apparently can't do a quick move. Do you have the means, or will this need to be taken to the technical requests section? Avilich (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can't do a quick move either. Bringing this up as a technical request should be fine given that I don't see why anyone would oppose it and since you and I tend to be the only people arguing about this kind of stuff. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
