Talk:Seth Warshavsky
Appearance
Seth Warshavsky was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]His 15 minutes were up in 1999.
GA failed
[edit]As of [1], the article during this review, I speedy failed this article for Good Article. This article is still stub and unsourced. Please expand this article and provide it with reliable sources to support the three pillars of Wikipedia: neutral point of view, verifiable and contains no element of original research. Please read again what a good article is. If this article ready, then it can be renominated again. — Indon (reply) — 12:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Not a TLD
[edit]Sex.com is not a top level domain, it's a domain. I corrected this. .com is a top level domain. 76.170.99.185 (talk) 06:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)