Talk:Seth Roberts

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

"It was criticized by UCLA nutritionist Dr. John Ford." The cited article doesn't criticize the diet, it criticizes Roberts' approach to publishing it. I suggest that we reword this. --149.126.106.19 (talk) 10:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emeritus

Is this guy really notable? If you are going to change him back to being a professor emeritus please cite your source (other than claims he has forwarded through the media).

A phone call to his department verified that he is a professor emeritus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.162.236 (talk) 17:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picking this back up, the Emeritus claim needs to be confirmed. On some sites Roberts himself says merely that he was "formerly" a UCB prof. Why would he say formerly if he was actually Emeritus. And it's unusual, although not unheard of, for an Emeritus to be working somewhere else and not retired. Emeritus is a significant title of some status (and old codgerness). If Roberts is Emeritus, there needs to be more than an anonymous note that someone phoned his old department. 70.114.180.201 (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A UC Berkeley publication called him emeritus.See: http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2010/07/15/happiness/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BCCD:4080:B8A1:7A68:EF64:B1E (talk) 14:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That article certainly has the Berkeley stamp, but if that's all that can be found, then given how substantial a claim of "Emeritus" is, it -- a mere newsletter and not a statement by Berkeley proper -- is a pretty weak set of evidence. Letting it stand for now, but it would be good if there was something more substantial. 70.114.180.201 (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Seth Roberts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]