Talk:Seth Moulton

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Withdrawn, September 8, 2014, see discussion.
Delete, June 28, 2013, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Massachusetts / Military history / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

New Draft for Seth Moulton

This is a draft for a new page on Seth Moulton. The previous page was deleted due to lack of references and perceived importance (See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seth_Moulton). I believe this draft satisfies all Wikipedia rules regarding notability, references, and neutral point-of-view. Please feel free to edit or comment on this draft page - I am currently giving the admins responsible for the prior deletion time to comment, but will be posting this to the new page shortly. -Rustavo, 1 September, 2014

Please feel free to join the discussion about this draft at Kudpung's talk page. -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 01:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace per d/w Kudpung -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 22:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Photo

Are we not able to get his congressional photo for the infobox? Guyb123321 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see one on his congressional website. But we would be able to use it, if you found it somewhere else. -- Calidum 19:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about promotional tone of recent edits

I'm concerned about the promotional tone of recent edits to this article. For example, this recent edit [1] contains a long, self-congratulatory quote by the candidate. The edit summary for the edit is "Add more on his commitment to Veterans." That edit summary and the content of the edit, as well as other recent edits here, leave me concerned that our neutrality policy is not being adhered to. We should be impartial and fact-based, not seeking to show that a politician has a "commitment" to anything in particular. Champaign Supernova (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am in agreement that the recent edits by 1077 seem NPOV in nature, however they are also adding new information which is certainly needed. I would suggest the aticle be gone over with a comb to sift out any obvious promotion, but that being said this is an article about a US Rep from MA so someone will probably come along in the near and try to get it up to GA status. And with that being said, a close eye should probably be put on this page, and 1077 be warned if they go from seemingly/implied to blatant promotion. Do you/anyone have any other suggestions? Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 23:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it now seems like 1077 is just blatantly copying info from Moulton's House page and including outright non-neutral wording. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 04:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, good catch. I'm going to go through the article today with a fine-toothed comb to make sure it doesn't contain any other copyright violations. Champaign Supernova (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody Should Improve the Bronze Star Part

The article makes it seem like a Bronze Star is a bit more than it is. Now I'm not running down this medal, having one myself, but it also is true that it doesn't take Audie Murphy-esqe actions to earn one even with the "v" device.

2018 anti-Pelosi efforts

Why is there nothing about his 2018 efforts to prevent Pelosi from becoming House speaker? It's by far what he's received the most national news coverage for in recent months... AnonMoos (talk) 18:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. His anti-Pelosi crusade is almost the only thing attached to his name in my memory. "The Pathetic Pelosi Putsch" (2018) lays out quite a bit of the story though it's too opinion-laden to be a good source for the article. There's also The Boston Globe (starting in 2017), and just about anything written about Moulton in fall 2018 was really about his attempt to dump Pelosi, e.g. The Hill. It should be in the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign policy

The only comment in this article under "Foreign policy" is:

"Moulton opposed sending U.S. troops back to Iraq in 2014."

How lame can you be? Readers of this article deserve to be given a reasonable account of his views on Foreign policy. ---Dagme (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

American High-Speed Rail Act

I recently created an article for the American High-Speed Rail Act. Any help improving the article would be appreciated. Thank you, Thriley (talk) 22:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent news coverage of Moulton: trip to Kabul

Wikipedia is NOTNEWS, so I am putting links here rather than info in the article: "Two Congress members make unauthorized trip to Kabul amid evacuation efforts" (WaPo 8/24) and "Two Congress members fly to Kabul, infuriate DoD, White House" (Military Times 8/24) Moulton has a statement , and if the event gets continued coverage, more context may emerge. HouseOfChange (talk) 13:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RS for sourcing Moulton's political positions

In the context of Moulton's 2019 moonshot at the Dem nomination for president, his political positions got detailed coverage in RS.^[1]^[2]^[3] We shouldn't neglect these good RS to cite potentially-impermanent sources such as ontheissues.org or Moulton's own website and press releases. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ DeCosta-Klipa, Nik (February 12, 2019). "What sort of presidential campaign would Seth Moulton run?". Boston.com. Retrieved September 4, 2021. one of Moulton's biggest focuses is addressing the long-term impact of automation on the economy, which he says will disproportionately affect working-class communities. His answer to the expected crisis is re-education...As a member of the centrist New Democrat Coalition, Moulton backed a broad plan unveiled by the group of moderates last May to address technology's effects on the workforce.
^ Mahaskey, M. Scott. "Generals Love Him, Top Democrats Despise Him. Can Seth Moulton Be President Anyway?". Politico Magazine. in early 2008, Moulton and Lemons and some other Marines were making frozen hamburgers on the roof of their barracks in southern Iraq, talking about exit plans. Moulton was going back to Harvard, pursuing graduate degrees at the business school and the Kennedy School of Government. After that, though, he might run for Congress, he said.
^ Council on Foreign Relations "Seth Moulton"

Supporting President Joseph Biden and the people working with him

It is truly disappointing to hear that you do not support the President. The Democrats need to hold each other up not bring them down. Shame 2601:199:4301:4FB0:9040:D496:5FB9:7B1 (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[NDK2019-1] DeCosta-Klipa, Nik (February 12, 2019). "What sort of presidential campaign would Seth Moulton run?". Boston.com. Retrieved September 4, 2021. one of Moulton's biggest focuses is addressing the long-term impact of automation on the economy, which he says will disproportionately affect working-class communities. His answer to the expected crisis is re-education...As a member of the centrist New Democrat Coalition, Moulton backed a broad plan unveiled by the group of moderates last May to address technology's effects on the workforce.

[pltco2019-2] Mahaskey, M. Scott. "Generals Love Him, Top Democrats Despise Him. Can Seth Moulton Be President Anyway?". Politico Magazine. in early 2008, Moulton and Lemons and some other Marines were making frozen hamburgers on the roof of their barracks in southern Iraq, talking about exit plans. Moulton was going back to Harvard, pursuing graduate degrees at the business school and the Kennedy School of Government. After that, though, he might run for Congress, he said.

[3] Council on Foreign Relations "Seth Moulton"

[1]

[2]

[3]