Talk:Service-oriented programming

This seems more like a description for Nextaxiom's product and less like a paradigm or industry term. Perhaps it should be rewritten to accurately describe the service engine rather than an industry paradigm that SOA supports.

The introduction uses far to much technical terminology making it very hard to read, and the core principles it is describing hard to discern. This sort of language would only be suited to someone who was a specialist in service oriented software architectures, which kinds of renders the introduction useless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottie UK (talk • contribs) 23:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reference for modules

seems off. think it should refer ho modular programming. immeëmosol (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oldid 319164570 immeëmosol (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]