Talk:Sertoli cell tumour

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sertoli cell tumour.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

note

To those editors with more experience of editing:

This page on sertoli cell tumors is rather confusing / inaccurate. Sertoli cell tumors are mostly found in males and yet the article speaks of these tumors in females (of which they occur with much less frequency). I would suggest that this is made clearer in the article or (less preferably) the article is split into 2 pages, one dealing with this tumor type and one dealing with it in females. Regards. AlanWolfe (talk) 12:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked at the article, I agree entirely that it is unclear and confusing, and that it gives more prominence to the female case of a condition which it says itself occurs mainly in males. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some changes which hopefully make some aspects of the page clearer. AlanWolfe (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]