Talk:Serica

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

pov

"These Neo-Persians were cruel and treacherous in war and society, yet the allure of wealth made them acquiescent, and the Romano-Serican intercourse was not halted by the violent removal of the Parthian brokers for long."

I really was like wtf man. Mallerd (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written in extremely flowery language. I'll try to tone it down a bit.--Joostik (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Why not merge Serica with Seres? Theoretically one is about the country the other about the people, in practice it comes down to the same. The whole article seems superfluous.--Joostik (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imaus

This article says the "Imaus" are the Tian Shan; but Seres says the Imaus are the Pamir Mountains . Only one can be correct. Wardog (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Land where silk comes from" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Land where silk comes from has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26 § Land where silk comes from until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Σηρίνδα

Wikipedia nowhere mentions Σηρίνδα (Serinda) as another name of the land of the Seres. 2602:306:C4CE:9AF9:CCAA:709:3521:C041 (talk) 04:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a source where we could see/learn more about this variant nme? Remsense聊 04:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that the first (or only?) mention of Σηρίνδα ('Sērínda) is in the writings of Procopius, in the story of the monks who smuggled silkworms out of the country. Mention of Serinda can be found online in

'Mapping Byzantine Sericulture in the Global Transfer of Technology',

'The Changing Place of Silk throughout Antiquity: From the Earliest Evidence in Aristotle to the Twelfth Century A.D.' by Alexandra Kujanpaa, and

https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Serindia-Detailed-Report-Explorations-Central-Asia/22876931248/bd,

to name a few, and the last one solves the mystery for me, because we find there this quote of Aurel Stein:

"The term Serindia, as adopted (in the form Sérinde) by valued French fellow-scholars, is excellently suited for the designation of this region, well-defined by nature as well as by historical relationship. Significant brevity would amply justify its use even if the interpretation which derives Procopius' local name Serinda from a compound of the terms [in Greek Seres, the classical name for the people of Serica or China] and India may prove to have no better foundation than 'learned popular etymology'".

In other words Serindia is a modern creation based on an assumed etymology for Sērínda, and the present Wikipedia article does indeed mention Serindia (I used a word search looking for Serinda and thus missed it the first time).

Since it is Sērínda, and not Serindia, that Procopius actually used (I've checked), I'll go ahead now and make the change to the article myself :) 2602:306:C4CE:9AF9:E5F0:BA0:F848:7B8C (talk) 00:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much! Remsense聊 00:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]