Jump to content

Talk:Sergeant Reckless/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
collapse to condense talk page
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 21:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally getting around to reviewing this article...should have my full review up by late tonight. Dana boomer (talk) 21:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Per WP:LEAD, the lead should be larger: perhaps two paragraphs? Her military career especially could stand to be fleshed out in the lead.
    • Origins, "The horse was originally named Ah Chim Hai in Korean,[6] which translates to "Morning Flame" or "Flame-in-the-Morning",[7][8] reputed to be the name of her dam," - She had the same name as her dam?
    Took a stab at it today. PumpkinSky talk 20:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    ITD helped too. PumpkinSky talk 22:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    MTBW just did her part. PumpkinSky talk 23:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Who is the real publisher for Giaffo, Lou "Gooch's Marines"? The Google Books page says that it's Dorrance Publishing, which appears to be a self-publishing company. RoseDog Books appears to be a bookstore. If the book is self-published, what makes Giaffo a reliable source?
    • Military service, "When learning a new delivery route, Reckless would only need someone to lead her a few times. Afterwards she would make the trips on her own." Source?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall, looking good. A couple more comments above, but that should take care of the majority of the work to be done. Once the above are addressed, I'll take another read-through, but at this point the article is very close to GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 01:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redid and expanded the lede. Hope it's an improvement and we are good to go! Montanabw(talk) 23:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've re-read and everything looks good. Sorry for taking a few days to get back to this. Now passing to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, Dana. We all have real lives. Thanks for the great review, article is much better. I love Reckless' story, I love it! PumpkinSky talk 21:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]