Jump to content

Talk:Seram mountain pigeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSeram mountain pigeon has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSeram mountain pigeon is part of the Mountain pigeon series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2022Good article nomineeListed
April 11, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Seram mountain pigeon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 22:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Reading now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I really think the first description should be cited. Here it is: [1]
It's already there?
  • Other common names for the species include Seram mountain-pigeon and Seram long-tailed mountain-pigeon.[6][7] – Please create a redirect for the other name, and I don't think the "-" makes a separate name.
Done.
  • As I suggested for the other mountain pigeon articles, a sentence with context about the genus would be very helpful.
Added.
  • The Seram mountain pigeon was previously considered to be a subspecies of the Buru mountain pigeon, but was split on the basis of differences in appearance.[9] – Needs detail: Who classified it as a subspecies, and when? What was the scientific name? And who did move it back into its own species again, and when? When was it moved into Gymnophaps, and by whom? These are important aspects of the taxonomic history.
Added.
  • Great to have this egg photograph, that is awesome. But that article contains a second photo, showing the position of the nest. Can we add this as well? Would be more useful than the general photo of the forest, or, alternatively, could be placed side-by-side with the egg photo in an image plate (see Lythronax, the plate in section "Paleobiology", for an example what I mean). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced the image of forest with one of the position of nest.