This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
I removed that link and put up a link to the spelling in Arabic, as I was dubious when Google Maps only found it via link to Wikipedia - hence needing to meet a better standard of third-party verifiability. Everything else on this article needs to be cited, if not only from those "further reading" sources. Michael Sheflin (talk) 06:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Despite that link to an article that spells the name سرابيت (the article is a travelogue in a popular magazine), Google turns up several times as many hits with the spelling سرابيط, and they appear to be more scholarly and authoritative, such as the official Egyptian government site http://www.sis.gov.eg/Ar/LastPage.aspx?Category_ID=529. Likewise the Egyptian Wikipedia (http://arz.wikipedia.org/wiki/سرابيط_الخادم) spells it with ط. I've therefore changed it to the latter, and removed the link to the article with the so-called "Definitive spelling in Arabic". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.73.8 (talk) 15:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]