Talk:Sequalitchew Creek

United States: Washington Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Sequalitchew Creek appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sequalitchew Creek was the location of the original Fort Nisqually trading post established in 1833 by the Hudson's Bay Company?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

Wikipedia

Not clear on neutrality & citations

The Proposed mining expansion section could use a citation or two beyond the 1994 agreement. Without that, the neutrality of the section could be challenged. The section cites the 1994 agreement, but does not cite anything where anyone agrees that the parties are not following the agreement. Without that, this could be read as someone trying to advance their own agenda via Wikipedia. Bigjimleo (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three additional footnotes/references have been added. The external link ~~(already included)~~ to the Glacier Mine Expansion Web site could also be cited if you think that would help? I've been careful to keep the description neutral, speaking only to the fact of what has been proposed in the mine expansion, while still accurately describing the area as it is now, and in the past. Further comments/suggestions are welcome. Thanks. ~Geaugagrrl^talk 04:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My error. The Pioneer Aggregates Expansion and North Sequalitchew Creek Project Web site is now listed in the external links section. I can cite it in the article if need be? It is very descriptive including flash animation of gravel removal, aquifer draining and conceptualization of North Sequalitchew creek which will be used to channel water into the existing Sequalitchew creek. ~Geaugagrrl^talk 04:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--- The main author of this page represents the sequalitchew creek council. Most of the history and backstory have been left out in order to further her cause. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.229.81 (talk) 05:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is not correct. The main editor to this page does not represent Sequalitchew Creek Council. This page is open to editing by all, as long as the content added/changed is properly referenced, and is neutral. Why not contribute what you feel is missing. Good luck. ~Geaugagrrl^talk 07:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]