This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Months in the 1900s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Months in the 1900sWikipedia:WikiProject Months in the 1900sTemplate:WikiProject Months in the 1900sMonths in the 1900s articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. The "(month)" part of the name is an anomaly among such articles and seeks simply to aid in resolving the distinction between the month and the poem. Eliminating the disambiguation page and using the redirection clause at the start of this page is ample solution, less complex, and in keeping with WP:COMMONNAME. Evensteven (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am changing my position in light of Dohn joe's argument below. While COMMONNAME is ordinarily a big deciding factor, a 75% usage the other way makes PRIMARYTOPIC the more important issue. The same reductions in naming complexity are still possible if we rename the poem's article. Evensteven (talk) 00:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and moveSeptember 1913 (poem) to September 1913. Normally, the month would be the no-brainer WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. But here, the poem clearly is. Month articles from 1913 generally get around 250 views per month:
I understand the consistency argument that some people would use here, but WP:PRIMARYTOPIC tells us that when 75% of people have shown they want a particular page, we should probably send them there! Dohn joe (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and moveSeptember 1913 (poem) to September 1913, per Dohn joe. However, I think we still ought to eliminate the disambiguation page, and simply use an equivalent redirection clause at the poem's article to point to the month's article. There's no great complexity in choosing between only two articles, and total views of the two together are not so high as to create traffic problems. Evensteven (talk) 00:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
