Talk:Senior Community Service Employment Program

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The information that two editors keep removing is sourced in government reports and is stated accurately in the text. While embarrassing to Experience Works, the public has a compelling right to know. Instead of just taking it down, please offer constructive edits. Would you prefer more information to be included, like the name of the organization's registered lobbyist cited for the inappropriate activities? That and other details are also available to the public. My own thought is that is a bit too much info for Wiki, but I'm happy to include it if you wish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OlderWorker (talk • contribs) 09:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I've observed is an edit war going on over content of the article. I've made one correction to a link this morning; yesterday, I rolled back to the last status-quo version of the article. I think anybody wanting to make a change to the article should discuss it here and make sure there's consensus for the chance.

Also, with respect to Experience Works, make sure the information is relevant to the subject of the article, the Senior Community Service Employment Program. The actions of a participant in the program aren't always appropriate for the article about the program. Note that I haven't reviewed the edit in depth, though; I'm just commenting based on how you described the edit. —C.Fred (talk) 13:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@OlderWorker: In this edit, even if you're basing the edit on works already cited in the article, you should go ahead and cite them here so other editors can readily verify it. Again, I'm not opining on whether the content should go in the article; I'm pointing out that it really must cite a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by OlderWorker

The edits being made by Older Worker are being made by a disgruntled prior employee of Experience Works who is including content that is misleading and damaging. He makes statements about Experience Works and the current CEO that are not accurate. Scsep (talk) 04:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]