Talk:Sema v. COMELEC and Dilangalen

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I created this article, since this is the first Philippine jurisprudence, since 1901, June 12, which annulled an entire Province, despite the huge amount spent for referendum. The aftermath, is total legal uncertainty and displacement for officials and employees.--Florentino floro (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image, template -Kennedy v. Louisiana

I added this simple template, since I do not know how to make the very beautiful template of USA decisions. Note that this Sema v. Comelec is the only and first Wikipedia Philippine decision article. So, like in the USA Wiki decision articles like Kennedy v. Louisiana, we must have a template as User:Anyo Niminus made for others. Subic rape case, is not a decision but just another article. I also added the image but small, since, I just copied the USA format and I used the same image already displayed in Supreme Court of the Philippines. Please make a better one like Kennedy or Baze v. Rees--Florentino floro (talk) 09:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Supremes.png

The image Image:Supremes.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]