Talk:Self-constancy

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 October 2019 by reviewer SmokeyJoe (talk · contribs).

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Accepted

I accepted this draft, but am tempted to stubify it. The topic appears real, well sourced, but the draft went beyond the scope of the topic, content-forking other topics. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

"self constancy" only gets 7,450 googles while "self consistency" gets 613,000 googles. Should we change what title we have this article at? RJFJR (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. Self consistency is a different, older, very common term that refers to a behaviour, of people, and of theories. “Self constancy” is a nuanced internal psychological phenomena. That’s my reading, anyway. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self-consistency is about a level or a standard that an individual expects of themselves. This would be like a professional footballer scoring a hat-trick of goals in consecutive games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordieth Borovsky (talk • contribs) 23:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency in dates

In the second sentence of the article, it says the theory was developed by Prescott Leckey in the 1920s, but in the following section, it says the term was first coined by Heinz Hartmann in 1952. Is there a subtlety here w/r/t theory vs. terminology, or is it just a mistake? B. Ellinies (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]