Talk:Self-Portrait Dedicated to Leon Trotsky/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dylan620 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely painting! I should have a review done within the next few days. --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 01:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I'm almost done; should have the review published tomorrow (ET). --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
A few very minor issues, detailed below
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
One of the details mentioned in the article isn't backed up by the cited source; more on this below
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Watch out for "x is" conjunctions; there are a couple of these in §Description

Fixed I tried to resolve it as best as I could -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stray quotation mark at the end of one of the paragraphs

-Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The definite article in the painting's alternate title should be de-capitalized (Between the Curtains)

-Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "(pictured)" in the NMWA photo caption should be italicized between the parentheses

-Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That Kahlo called Trotsky "El Viejo" is not supported by the citation which follows it, but I did find a Smithsonian Magazine article which supports this. I'm a little worried that the current wording of the sentence could give rise to WP:SYNTH issues by perhaps giving the impression that "El Viejo" was insult; maybe something like Calling Trotsky "The Old Man" (El Viejo), Kahlo was attracted to his...?

Fixed The Smithsonian source is also cited in the sentence. -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's about it – I enjoyed reading the article and its sources, and it's a fine piece of work. Once these small issues are addressed, I can pass the article. --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylan620 Hey there! I'm just a random passerby editor going around helping GANs here and there and have contributed to this one. I tried to resolve all the above issues to the best of my abilities so feel free to let me know if there are further issues. -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@APK Also notifying you so that you are up to date on this. Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Dylan620:! Let me know if you have any other concerns @Dylan620:. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@APK: I assume the first ping was meant to be for Dcdiehardfan? Indeed, very cool of you DCDHF to do that :) Most of your fixes work quite well – you did miss one of the contractions I was referring to, but honestly it's such a small thing that I can take care of it myself after I hit "publish changes". (For what it's worth, I'd only meant that the contractions should have been expanded, i.e. she's → she is.) My next edit will be to touch up what little else needs to be taken care of; the one after that will involve passing the article. Congratulations, APK! --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylan620 Thank you! And that was my bad haha, but either way, I'm glad that the article has passed! Congrats @APK! Dcdiehardfan (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.