Talk:Selenite (mineral)

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Selenite (mineral) is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocks and minerals Mid‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Selenite (mineral) is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Largest Selenite Crystal

Pic

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/theweekinpictures/3331785/The-week-in-pictures-31-October-2008.html?image=29 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.199.79 (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into gypsum

I think this stuff should be merged into gypsum. Discussion on Talk:Gypsum please. M0ffx 22:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the bit about the aliens at the end should be put on the diambiguation page

I'm pretty sure that Satin-Spar and Selenite are two different minerals (though both types of gypsums), but i dont know enough about it to make a new page for satin-spar. Frail Elf 07:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AshleyWitchcrafter 19:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC) I've written an article on selenite, satin spar, desert roses, and gypsum flowers - in that I would like to update the selenite article. However, being my first article, I would very much like to have it reviewed. I also have some pictures - but am awaiting on a couple for permission to reproduce at Wikipedia. The article is pasted below. The most "controversial" part of the article is the "Crystal Therapy" section. Plus I'm not sure if I've done references correctly, etc, etc. [Oops. I did do lots of internal links - looks like they disappeared with this paste.] Thanks, AshleyWitchcrafter[reply]

Pointless copy removed. Vsmith (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kevmin has proposed merging this article into Gypsum; see Talk:Gypsum. --Una Smith (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The ambiguity of the term "selenite" is causing incorrect links to this article. I propose to move this article to Selenite (mineral), move Selenite (disambiguation) here, then disambiguate the incoming links. --Una Smith (talk) 03:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have disambiguated all incoming links to Selenite. While I was doing so, another editor added Selenite (mineral) to the section of selenium compounds. Selenite the mineral and selenite the ion have nothing in common except the name selenite. This is a chronic source of confusion, so please leave the {{distinguish}} hatnote on this article. --Una Smith (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was my goof - momentary brain phart. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 00:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vsmith isn't the first editor to confuse these, which is why Selenite needs to be a dab page. --Una Smith (talk) 15:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note on temperature

I just deleted a phrase claiming the cave temperature was 58 degrees. I know this is commonly true in caves, but I had just read the National Geographic article on the Naica caves (the first in the list of off site links). That stated the temperature in the cave is 112 degrees and that when it was water filled it was 136 degrees. I don't know how to do citations so I did not add this information, but I thought I should remove the (unattributed) 58 degree figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.238.184.235 (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replace as it said 58 °C not °F. Vsmith (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selenite (mineral). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070625000827/http://books.smenet.org/Surf_Min_2ndEd/sm-ch02-sc10-ss09-bod.cfm to http://books.smenet.org/Surf_Min_2ndEd/sm-ch02-sc10-ss09-bod.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Selenite confusion

A box of links was placed at the bottom of this article on the 15th of february. This box contained links to several selenites, selenates, tellurites, and tellurates that have pages on wikipedia. This was incorrect since selenite is not actually classed in the mineralogical group of 'selenites' since it does not contain the selenite ion. This is of course just an innocent case of confusion, so I have taken the liberty to remove this linkbox again.

Greetings, Ceasars Salad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceasars Salad (talk • contribs) 11:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Selenite

What the hell do you discuss about Selenite 188.143.116.228 (talk) 11:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]