Talk:Security forces

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Tag

Reference point for anybody following the "disambiguation cleanup" tag to this page. I don't know what needs to be improved. I've read the MoS and it still isn't clear to me what specifically editors should do to improve this page - call me stupid, mentally impaired, whatever you wish. I'm just not seeing it and if this disambig violates a couple of guidelines they need to be stated more clearly. I don't approve of drive-by tagging, and even less when somebody just mutters something about "Mos violation" and leaves, without doing anything to resolve the issues himself or at least give everybody else a blerrie clue what he sees that needs fixing.

Some guesses I have (keep in mind these are guesses because nobody has informed me or anybody else what the problem is, since "MoS violation" is a very vague term):

1) References are not needed.
2) Introductory sentences are too long.
3) Not all the links should be listed.

Let me know what the problem is, discuss with the editors, but at least be a thorough WikiImp. Care about the page instead of just throwing egg on it.

Thanks, --Katangais (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]