Talk:Securities Investor Protection Corporation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Copyright violation

It appears that most/all of the text added by User:Aslsigner on June 1, 2006, is taken from copyrighted pages at http://www.sipc.org/ , including http://www.sipc.org/who/notfdic.cfm (Not the FDIC), http://www.sipc.org/how/involved.cfm (When SIPC Gets involved), and http://www.sipc.org/how/covers.cfm (What SIPC Covers...), and brochure page http://www.sipc.org/how/brochure.cfm . I'm reverting to the version by User:Tawkerbot2 from April 24, 2006, as it doesn't appear that this stub version violates the SIPC copyright. FelineAvenger 19:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The site also says the SIPC is not a government agency. Therefore, the usual US Government agency principle that all official websites are in the public domain is not the status of the SIPC website. However, the statute creating the SIPC is in the public domain. This article will receive increasing scrutiny due to the Madoff scandal and others, and needs improvement. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madoff Swindle

Does the SIPC only stand behind the direct investors in Madoff's firm, or does it stand behind the thousands of investors who put money into feeder funds (most of these are foreigners, apparently). If so, it will bankrupt the SIPC. Therefore, where does the additional money come from? The U.S. government? Or does the SIPC slap a huge tax on the remaining securities industry. I mean, the feeder funds weren't pay SIPC dues/premiums. But this article says everybody is going to get paid and the taxpayer will have to pay for it: http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/02/21/2009-02-21_bernie_madoff_never_invested_a_dime_for_.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.128.37 (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even paying $500,000 to each victim of the Madoff fraud may exhaust the funds of the SIPC. This issue needs more exploration. Also, the Madoff fraud is not the only one, there are smaller ones, too. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States Government template

Should the United States Government template be on this talk page? The SIPC was created by statute, but the organization itself is owned by its members and is explicitly not a government agency. The USG template implies that this is a government entity, offering reassurance that the government will back the SIPC up, should its funds be insufficient for the various Ponzi schemes recently uncovered. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to leave the United States Government template in place and set class and importance, because some readers may think it is a government agency, but actually it is created by Congress to act on behalf of investors without having an explicit federal guarantee. It does have the legal power to assess its members. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Recent changes by Concernedinvestor are in some instance valid, with inline citations, but in other instances do not have a neutral point of view. I am unable to make edits to correct this at this time, but I would like Concernedinvestor and other editors to make appropriate changes. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ETFs and ETNs?

Does it cover ETFs and ETNs? Ywaz (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110220170019/http://www.sipc.org/how/brochure.cfm to http://www.sipc.org/how/brochure.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]