Jump to content

Talk:Secure Communities

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK

[edit]

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code if you created a new article:

{{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

or this code if you expanded it

{{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=expanded | author= }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to promulgate political views

[edit]

This entire article is written as agenda-driven partisan political literature. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 15:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Secure Communities is not one thing

[edit]

I moved lots of content out of this article just now, hoping to be narrow specifically on the Secure Communities program. However, I am no longer convinced that there is a well-defined Secure Communities program. Originally, I think the term referred to localities providing ICE with fingerprints. However, when Secure Communities was ended in 2014, that continued. The second major component is detainers, which also continued in a lesser way when it "ended". Most of the discussion and commentators on Secure Communities seem to be speaking about ICE activity under the Obama administration generally. Perhaps "Secure Communities" referred to the administrative division of ICE that acts on the basis of hits in their database from fingerprints shared by local agencies. I'm starting to think that the ending of Secure Communities was a PR ploy (see news from that time[1][2], eg. "It’s not really clear at this stage if there’s any real, meaningful change that’s going to happen with regard to detainers"[3]), as is the restarting of it under Trump,[4] but that's original research.

My real problem is that we don't have a well-defined article topic. I'm starting to think we should restore much of what I removed and move it all to "Immigration policies of the Obama administration". However, I'm struggling with whether there should be any Secure Communities article at all. Also, moving would involve removing much of the commentary, since many of the commentators are discussing Secure Communities as such, not Obama's policies generally. What do others think? Sondra.kinsey (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]