Talk:Secunderabad/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 16:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid that I'm quick failing this nomination, but in order to aid the improvement of the article overall, I'm going to specify what needs to happen for the article to be properly considered and reviewed at GA.
The first couple of paragraphs of History are well cited, but the third paragraph is entirely uncited and then the end of the fourth and all of the fifth are also uncited.
Only the first half of Geography is cited. The first paragraph of Climate is uncited. Second and last paragraphs of Culture are uncited, as is the final part of the first paragraph. The first paragraph of Administration has no references, nor does the Media section. The information about stadiums in Sports doesn't have any references either. Three of the five paragraphs in Transport needs citations, and so does the second half of Education.
The Commons link should be moved from the References section to the External links section.
The References should each display as much information as possible - in some cases you have bare urls, in others just a title.
I think once those issues have been addressed then you'll be ready to relist to have someone take a further look. Miyagawa (talk) 16:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)