Jump to content

Talk:Section 2 (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 31 October 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: All moved apart from Section 28. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



WP:ASTONISH, since "Section" followed by a number is such a widely used convention that no one would reasonably expect the current mix of specific legislative provisions and popular culture topics. Each of these topics either already has a disambiguation page or has other meanings that can be disambiguated against. bd2412 T 11:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A recent episode of RuPaul's Drag Race UK actually featured some very moving commentary about Section 28 from drag queen Divina de Campo (which has caused a brief spike in pageviews - which is why I cut off the pageview comparison linked earlier at 10/30). And of course, she referred to it simply as "Section 28", not "Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988". Colin M (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Section 2, Section 5, and Section 22 moves, oppose the others, strong oppose to moving Section 28. Section 2 & 5 are fine, seems like there's no primary topic, so use a disambig page. The Section articles that don't have anything else that could be disambiguated by them don't need a disambiguator at all (e. g. Section 32), so no need to create one until there is "competition" for the name. Section 31 is debatable, but there's a lot of sourced material on the Star Trek organization and a novel series and all, and most of the other options on the disambig page don't even have articles, with the only competitor that comes close being Section 31 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is still a rather obscure topic. Section 28 was discussed before but is universally referred to in sources as just "Section 28" with "of the Local Government Act" almost never appearing; see Talk:Section_28#Requested_move_9_June_2015 for the previous RM where moving that failed. (Also, disagree with claim above that the "UK statute is not more significant" than the other options - only specialist Canadian solicitors deal with specific sections of a law that is rarely litigated on, while the UK statute was radioactively controversial and plastered on newspaper frontpages for a decade for debate amongst the general UK public. The UK law is more notable, as the length of the reference section would suggest.) SnowFire (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support moving all section # titles as something like this is clearly not meant to be at the base name. Don't have a preference for what the end result title and disambiguation for the moved titles is, so support any version. --Gonnym (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 14:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for clarifying (it's not hatnoted), I've amended. GiantSnowman 14:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have gone ahead and created Section 22 (disambiguation), Section 25 (disambiguation), Section 28 (disambiguation), and Section 32 (disambiguation). bd2412 T 15:58, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.