Talk:Secret Truths/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Please add a few more references to the lead section before this can be passed.
Reviewer: Hugahoody (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is there anything in particular you'd like to see cited? WP:LEADCITE suggests that citations are not necessary in the lead when the information isn't too controversial and is cited in the main body of the article, to avoid redundancy. 97198 (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the writer in this case; the lead should not be reffed unless necessary, such as with controversial statements about a BLP. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- In that case, it's a pass :) Hugahoody (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. :) 97198 (talk) 23:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- In that case, it's a pass :) Hugahoody (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the writer in this case; the lead should not be reffed unless necessary, such as with controversial statements about a BLP. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)