Talk:Secret Mountain Fort Awesome/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 08:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I've never seen the show, but will review the article from an outsider's perspective.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Nice work. I did a light copyedit for typos and MoS, but I don't see any outstanding issues.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Well referenced. Some of the sources aren't great, but their usage looks okay – there's nothing too controversial.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Good work here, considering the available information. The only quibble I have is that the end date of the series' broadcast should be mentioned in the "Broadcast and reception" section, ideally before the sentence reading "The remaining eight episodes of the season were published on iTunes from March 8 to March 29, 2014." (I assume it was pulled off the air midseason, which is why the last few episodes were released on iTunes, but this should be explicitly stated in the article if true.)
Rephrased to say: "Following the premiere of the eighth episode of the season on February 17, 2012, the series was pulled from broadcast. The network published the remaining eight episodes to iTunes a month later, from March 8 to March 29, thus concluding the series." ₂₃W
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
File:Secret Mountain Fort Awesome promotional image.jpg should be resized to a lower resolution to comply with fair use.
A bot should get to it shortly. ₂₃W
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Overall this is a nice article, and very close to meeting the GA criteria. I'll place this on hold so you can address the issues I've pointed out. 97198 (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the review and copy edit! I think I've addressed all the issues. ₂₃W 14:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The tag on the image says a bot usually resize it within 24 hours, but the tag's been there almost a month so I'm not sure it's going to happen. Are you able to upload a smaller version yourself? 97198 (talk) 03:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@23W: pinging you in case you don't have this page on your watchlist. 97198 (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@97198: Terribly sorry, I thought I had replied. Anyway, I've done it manually. Thanks again for reviewing! ₂₃W 04:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks. Everything looks good to me so I'll promote the article. Well done! 97198 (talk) 04:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yay! Thank you! :D ₂₃W 04:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]