Talk:Secondary ion mass spectrometry

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mass spectrometry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Mass spectrometryWikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometryTemplate:WikiProject Mass spectrometryMass spectrometry articles

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Meganmwolf.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

modification of this October 4th

The modification of this October 4th was made by [EdC] who does not know how to edit pages from his french account.

Merge

I will be bold and redirect the Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy page here within days if not hours. The material on that page is either incorrect or not the appropriate place to discuss it.--Nick Y. 18:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

This page has horrendous grammar. If it was translated, a lot was lost in translation: too much for me to even attempt to correct. Johnny1926 21:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment I am upgrading the content, but due to I am native german speaker I hesitate on rating the grammar. Simskoarl 18:17, 2 September 2007 (CET).

- Dear Johnny1926, the content is more important than grammar. If you do not have time to help here, stop complaining and come back when you have time. The WIKI concept was created so that everybody can collaborate together. Simskoar, do not worry about Johnny's stupid words. Your text is understandable, and that is what matters. Keep on writing. Congratulations for your good collaboration here!

Modification

There is no reason for deleting "CAMECA" link. Every action like this will be immediately undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielcland (talk • contribs) 16:23, August 18, 2014‎

The link is already in the article body and doesn't need to be in the See also section (see MOS:SEEALSO). --Kkmurray (talk) 22:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]