Talk:Second Sumatran expedition

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Issues

The writer of this article appears to assume that the island of Sumatra was a part of the Malay world (then from this it would involve english colonial issues) in the early 19th century - I always thought that by that time it was in fact under Dutch influence at that stage - then it is commented that the attacks on shipping were by malays? I suspect some circumspect re-writing is needed to make this article credible - perhaps someone on the SEA milhist work group might bring something of balance to the otherwise biased and possibly incorrect assumptions in the article Satu Suro 09:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnographiclly challenged link

Malay as linked in Malay Peninsula/Malay in the lead paragraph reads as if the editor/linker of that is somewhat short or restricted of the knowledge required to understand why and how the americans might have rather broadly brushed a description of local sumatran seafarers - - the described pirates being linked to the other side of the strait suggests a problem or two of dealing with the descriptions - more accurately an encylopediac entry on this issue might be more accurate if it actually questioned the american reports - specially if they are going to ascribe a whole peninsula to a few sumatran seafarers. Satu Suro 12:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]