Talk:Second British Invasion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Second British Invasion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Second British Invasion

The 80s British Invasion is missing one of my favorites. Musical Youth, who had the hit Pass the Dutchie. They were kids from England and very artistic. Dionswope (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Really surprised Depeche Mode was left off of the main page too. 2605:A601:A801:FA00:CC9F:8C5F:1CA:8844 (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2000s+ invasions

I wouldn't call it over by 2002. With Atomic Kitten, 1 Direction, The Wanted, etc. it continued. They even complained about it on the show Big Time Rush. I hope someone continues it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaiisunfun (talk • contribs) 08:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New pop, not new wave: a story in two quotations

From the new pop page:

"New music" is a roughly equivalent but slightly more expansive umbrella term for a pop music and cultural phenomenon in the US associated with the Second British Invasion. The term was used by the music industry and by American music journalists during the 1980s to characterize then-new movements like new pop and New Romanticism.

From the new wave page:

Chuck Eddy, who wrote for the Village Voice in the 1980s, said in a 2011 interview that by the time of British New Pop acts' popularity on MTV, "New Wave had already been over by then. New wave was not synth music; it wasn’t even this sort of funny-haircut music. It was the guy in the Boomtown Rats wearing pajamas."

I wonder which sort of music it is this page is referring to... 137.22.187.42 (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a strong argument on Wikipedia, cite WP:SECONDARY sources. Don't cite Wikipedia itself, which fails WP:USERG and is unreliable.

Generally, we want our message to be consistent, but the consistency must come from outside of Wikipedia, not inside, or we would be in danger of being consistently wrong. Binksternet (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first three sources on the article call it new pop instead of new wave, so i think it should be changed. 2600:1008:B175:842:617E:9115:B94C:55F9 (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make this change but the page is protected 2600:1008:B118:D511:0:5F:6687:4101 (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to propose changes through the WP:EDITREQUEST system. Sergecross73 msg me 23:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at the three sources (Reynolds, CBS, and the New York Times) and you're indeed correct - have updated the page to reflect the citations accordingly. Stuckinthe1960s (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]