Talk:Sebastian Faulks

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

James Bond (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

why do we need to know the names of his nephew's best friends?

I have added a very detailed biography for Sebastian Faulks, literary themes, bibliography and hope to work on some of the plot summaries for his novels. Have already done Charlotte Gray (novel), On Green Dolphin Street, Human Traces, and Engleby. Ivankinsman 08:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't live in Holland Park, he lives on Ladbroke Grove.

OK, well why not change it yourself? I have amended this detail Ivankinsman 09:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Footprints on Mount Low

is there an ISBN? randomhouse.co.uk, worldcat, amazon and ebay don't know the title; only one anonymous thingamabrarian knows Mount Low -- Cherubino 22:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Charlotte Gray.jpg

Image:Charlotte Gray.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Literary Themes

is awful, breathless pandering. It may all be true, but is it really fact to say 'Faulks often seems to be at war with himself'?

Rewrite? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.144.78 (talk) 22:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this main article on SF and one has to have a certain amount of 'artistic licence' when describing literary fiction - after all, it is not the same as describing tractor components. I don't really see what the problem is here...Ivankinsman (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Week in December

SF comments on the instrusive role of technology in our lives in a Daily Telegraph article (29th August, 2009):

"Screens that have supplanted human communication, the alternative life of chat-rooms, internet information that saps the quest for real knowledge, reality television undermining reality. “We are living in a fractured society,” he says. “Everyone is doing their own thing. I do think this atomisation, to use a vogue word, is a threat.

What disturbs me is how increasingly reliant we are on this and this [he jabs at his computer screen and mobile phone]. When I went to France for the first time, aged nine, it was exciting. French fields! A French tree! But when my children go on holiday they don’t really notice the drive because they are texting or tapping. I’m not critical of them, but now everywhere is pretty much the same.”

Personally, I think Sebastian Faulk's has perceptively defined an interesting theme here. It seems that a generation is being bought up on a diet of lap tops, mobile phones, iPods, computer games consoles etc. - what happened to reading a great book and perhaps listening to your favourite radio station at the same time? Modern day society is so fluid, or people spend so much time at their work, that it is much easier now to tap out a message rather than speaking face-to-face (I must confess here that I am prone to this nowadays). I am looking forward to reading and its focus on this concept of 'atomisation'.Ivankinsman (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

The whole article is a lot of spamming. I suspect it is largely written by Faulks himself, using sock-puppets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.170.8 (talk) 11:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Someone with more time can identify the sock-puppets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.192.111 (talk) 13:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Complete tripe I'm afraid and what on earth are sock-puppets? Puppets that you put into your Christmas stocking? Socks with a puppet design on them? Ivankinsman (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the cap fits, wear it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.114.225 (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/syltguides/fullview/22WYF6HDFWCQJ. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Yoenit (talk) 19:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Faulks Article

Can I ask why you - Yoenit- have removed all the information about Sebastian Faulks that I SPENT A HUGE AMOUNT OF TIME ON RESEARCHING. What you have left is a simple list of facts about this writer and IT IS A TOTAL DISGRACE, as you are as an editor. Who can I appeal to to have your work reviewed - I want this done by another Wikipedia editor who is totally independent and objective. You have simply removed all the information without ascertaining/giving a good enough reason for this. You say that it is all copyright violiations but that is simply not the case - it is complete crap to say that all this information was taken from the amazon article you have mentioned. Please can someone advise? Ivankinsman (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, as you are a serial copyright infringer, when there is evidence or reason to believe that you have copied content, it must be removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Long White Winter

This appeared in the Bibliography section but I cannot find any sources for it so I have removed it. GrahamHardy (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The IP that added it was later blocked for vandalism. Their additions should have been checked. I imagine this was vandalism too. The page was stripped right back in October 2010 after copyright violation enforcement. The article needs a lot of work. Again. Thanks for your additions. Span (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New novel?

There doesn't seem to be anything here about Faulks' new novel, "A Possible Life". We might need to work on that. --Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 19:24, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]