Talk:Sebaceous filament
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sebaceous filament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sebaceous filament be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Contradiction?
[edit]"They usually have white or yellow color, and can be expressed from the skin by pinching."
"Unlike blackheads, however, they cannot be removed and are a permanent part of the human skin. "
These statements seem to contradict each other. Dforest (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- I browsed the history, and it appears the latter statement ("Unlike blackheads ... permanent part of the human skin.") has been added, removed, then added back. While the former statement has a cited source, the latter statement does not. I believe we should remove the latter statement. If a source is found, I think it would be best to reword the statement before adding it back in. It looks like the intended meaning is something like this: "Unlike blackheads, their removal is not permanent, because they are regenerated by the sebaceous glands."
- --Firefeather (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Further Development
[edit]Probably a head about management, it's epidemiology since its apparent that it's permanent. Toyusus (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)