Talk:Seattle head tax/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 23:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
I’ll review this one. Courcelles (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- How much revenue was expected from the first head tax of 25 per employee?
- Already mentioned in the second paragraph:
amid the economic recession and a lower-than-expected annual revenue of $4.7 million
- Already mentioned in the second paragraph:
Otherwise I find an article that meets all the criteria. Courcelles (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Thanks for the review. I've answered your question above, though I'm not against adding the 2008 revenue, as it was an actual calculation rather than a forthcoming estimate. SounderBruce 00:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- That was the revenue generated, I’m wondering what was the expectated revenue? Courcelles (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Added projections for 2008 and the nine-year lifetime of the levy. SounderBruce 02:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, promoting. Courcelles (talk) 02:55, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Added projections for 2008 and the nine-year lifetime of the levy. SounderBruce 02:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- That was the revenue generated, I’m wondering what was the expectated revenue? Courcelles (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.