Talk:Seasons in the Abyss/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CallMeNathan Talk2Me 01:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Article
[edit]Lead
[edit]- Would be better to improve the lead a bit. Try and add more info from the body into it. The lead is supposed to talk briefly about most of the article.
- The entertainment Weekly and Allmusic info doesn't belong there, it belongs in the critical reception section. You should use the extra space to write more about the background and any other info. 2 full paragraphs seems appropriate.
- I wouldn't put the part about Temptation in the beginning, the information is to specific. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.45.174.153 (talk) 13:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Recording and production
[edit]- two separate places -> studios.
- Seasons in the Abyss was produced by Rick Rubin. It is their third album to be produced by Rubin. -> try to not cut the sentences up so much, it reads weirdly. Try and include both in one sentence.
- "Temptation" (track #8) -> indicate it in the text, not parentheses
- This paragraph needs significant re-writing
Musical styles and lyrical themes
[edit]On a whole, this section is a mess. It really looks like a continued "reception" section. It should dedicate specifically to the theme of the section, discussing the music and the meaning of its lyrics. ot calling it a "masterpiece" etc.
Release and reception
[edit]- You should give more info of the certifications, such as the RIAA certified it denoting shipment of 500K etc. Same goes for Canada.
Charts
[edit]- you should place them in order.
- you should make a separate column for certifications.
- I think it's all done. CrowzRSA 03:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
That's all good luck.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 19:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)