Talk:Seaforth Highlanders

Military history: British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Seaforths in Canada?

I gather that the Canadian Seaforth regiments are offshoots of the original, but I don't know more. Dropped by here to see if there was something on the Canadians, as I'm prepping a start-article for the Seaforth Armoury in Vancouver (right next to the south end of the Burrard Bridge...next to the brewery, appropriately perhaps....). Anyone know the history of the Canadian regiments, and should they be on a separate page or in a separate section on this one?Skookum1 09:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that 1881 would be in the 19th century...

originally raised in the 18th century, as part of the Childers Reforms of the British Army in 1881.

Escadrille Americaine (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to Merge Articles

Should this article not be merged with 72nd Regiment of Foot as it is essentially the same Regiment? Farawayman (talk) 12:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Farawayman, your Revision as of 22:32, 7 October 2009 has muddied the waters. Your addition of the pre-1881 details of the 72nd Highlanders ignores the contribution of the 78th Highlanders to the history of the Seaforth Highlanders and it is therefore not 'essentially the same regiment'. Up until your update of 19th October this page correctly concentrated on the Post-1881 merged regiment. The pre-1881 information on the 72nd Highlanders should be restricted to the 72nd Highlanders page. Brownag (talk) 07:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see the badge of the Seaforth Highlanders has also been incorrectly replaced by that of the 72nd Highlanders!Brownag (talk) 07:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No merging the two would be incorrect, they are not the same. The Seaforth Highlanders are the 78th and the 72nd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.92.236 (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Seaforth Highlanders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/072Seaf.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/072QOH.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]