Talk:Sculptures by Ligier Richier

Not really sure why the article singled out as having "multiple issues". In writing the piece I wanted.to highlight some of Richier's work and bring it to a wider audience. I hope efforts to "improve it" do not result in too many changes but I do understand that this will be beyond my control: if the article needs to be more encyclopedic then so be it.

Never really understand the "orphan" tag. There are numerous citations which in their way will bring the reader to many other links and Richier associations.

If anyone wishes to comment that wlll be fine.

Weglinde (talk) 09:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained the Essay worries on your tslk page.
To explain the "orphan" tag - if you click "what links here" under "Toolbox" to the left hand side of the article, you will find the message "No pages link to The works of Ligier Richier" - This tool counts how many other pages have links to "The works of Ligier Richier" - currently there are none. Perhaps you can think of pages which should be linked to "The works of Ligier Richier" and insert those links? - Arjayay (talk) 16:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will certainly give this a try. Thanks for advice Arjayay.

Weglinde (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, Weglinde, I think the article is excellent, and thank you very much for putting it together. However it does need to be brought into the house style; am working on that now. If its ok, will migrate some of your material into the bio, and spin out some of the more developed descriptions of individual works into separate articles. Ceoil (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]