Talk:Script Frenzy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Old talk
[edit]Okay, I have no idea how to write an article. However, considering that the site is now online and things are actually underway, the article should be created. I've put a one-sentence description. That's all. I just need to know how to format what should go in. Here's what should be in here:
- A basic description of the contest. This can be obtained from the site itself.
- Possibly a small bit on the history of the site itself, considering the two-day delay, as well as a brief mention of the 17:00 December 31 1969 glitch. However, just the basic description is probably all that is necessary, at least until the competition has taken place.
Really, someone else should be writing this, at least until I learn how. And I'm already tied up in Script Frenzy, so it might be best to have someone else do it. I'm sure I can maintain an objective stance, but...it's just a bad idea for me to do this. So, can someone write this article? The research should be simple, just go to the site (scriptfrenzy.org). Cliché-Brown 23:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Where did the original article go?? I have requested it to be undeleted, and I had at least three paragraphs of information, suitably explaining it for someone unfamiliar with the subject. I unfortunately have not been contacted if such undeletion has occurred, so if someone could please check that before tagging this article and deleting it again that would be appreciated. I created this article over 6 months ago, and it followed all the guidelines.
I would help fix it now but I unfortunately don't remember what I had originally written here, and I am too busy to try to rewrite it at the moment. So if you could PLEASE find the original, maybe that would help anyone trying to work on this article.
Sorry if I come across as angry, but honestly, this article keeps getting tagged for errors that aren't on it. Give it a chance and follow the source links that should be (or were) o if you think that it isn't "going to actually happen" or whatever was written on the original discussion page.
Sorry again, I just think that the original page should be restored and then you can work from there. I had a lot of information on it, so the current "uninformative" tag shouldn't be there.Verdamondo 04:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Um...I'm new...but, how does this article not have enough credible sources? Because all the information in the article is sourced, and can be confirmed by simply visiting the Script Frenzy site. Dread Pirate Felix 23:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
References
[edit]Any future information about the event other than date/place/rules, i.e., evaluations and comments about the event must be referenced by independent admissible for wikipedia sources. `'mikka 23:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! ^ ^ Dread Pirate Felix 22:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Does having used the NANO site and Script Frenzy site count? I've been BLONDBOMB in both places since 2002. They DO exist; they DO respond (ie. send money, receive promised jersey, now worn out, saying No Plot, No Problem...) Chris's book by that title is available on line from book sellers. He's quoted on ABOUT.COM in the writing forums. NANO has a place where you can read/post press articles. Someone's NANO book was opted for publication prior to writing it one year, and also showed up on line. (That person is gutsier than I am, to sign to publish a ROUGH DRAFT... My stuff needs to be EDITED!) I was not able to complete NANO the last few years, due to paying job with intensive reading/writing component required in that time frame, but I did clock the 20,000 words that was purported to equal a 2 hour movie script WHEN DONE CORRECTLY last year, but there was the rub. I'm still far too novelistic. By that word count, my plot arc was on Act II, Scene I, and the character arcs were still in early development/revelation stage, lol! That is NOT the fault of the offerings on the site, but a reflection of my abilities as a novice script-writer.
Copied from a google listing after typing in NO PLOT NO PROBLEM. An image of the actual book appears in the Amazon listing. Amazon.com: No Plot? No Problem!: A Low-Stress, High-Velocity ... Amazon.com: No Plot? No Problem!: A Low-Stress, High-Velocity Guide to Writing a Novel in 30 Days: Chris Baty: Books. www.amazon.com/ No-Plot-Problem-Low-Stress-High-Velocity/dp/0811845052 - 234k
Barnes & Noble.com - Books: No Plot? No Problem!, by Chris Baty No Plot? No Problem!: A Low-Stress, High-Velocity Guide to Writing a Novel in 30 Days, Baty, Chris Baty, Paperback, 1, Book, ISBN: 0811845052, Writing, ... search.barnesandnoble.com/ No-Plot-No-Problem/Chris-Baty/e/9780811845052 - 44k -
216.139.125.29 (talk) 09:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Blondbomb —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.139.125.29 (talk) 09:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Script Frenzy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120917022806/http://www.scriptfrenzy.org:80/node/4189006 to http://www.scriptfrenzy.org/node/4189006
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Script Frenzy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070512004717/http://www.scriptfrenzy.org:80/ to http://www.scriptfrenzy.org/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100618163859/http://www.lettersandlight.org/ to http://www.lettersandlight.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)