Talk:Scrip World Pharmaceutical News

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. There was no support for this move and in looking at the web site, I could not find support for either title. So best to leave alone for now. If we get supportable information that there is a better name, this can be relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Scrip World Pharmaceutical News → Scrip Intelligence — Scrip World Pharmaceutical News is rebranded as Scrip Intelligence User:Scripintelligence 10:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting use of the simple present passive. Does "is rebranded" mean "has been rebranded" or "will be rebranded". Clarify this or, better yet, use an active sentence with a citation for better consideration of the nomination. — AjaxSmack 18:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the proposer has been blocked. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.