Talk:Scratch Beginnings

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Was there any response to this book? It sounds like some kind of advertisement almost. Has Barbara Ehrenreich ever mentioned it?

I agree. There has to be wikipedia-worthy criticism of this book. Goodness knows I've heard plenty from unacceptable sources (e.g. friends, reader reviews). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.139.220.200 (talk) 16:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unable to find any response to this book; I suspect this is the result of a notability problem.Zhou Xi (talk) 07:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about the criticism that a white male with a college education doing alright supporting just himself for a few months while pretending to be poor doesn't say much? Night Jaguar (talk) 21:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I again did a overview of the books response. Seems to be near non existant. 85.226.57.239 (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@ night jaguar::: Is that any different from nickel and dimed, where a communist goes into a capitalist world and goes about in hotels and buys $40 jeans and then says lower class life os a failure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.66.210.197 (talk) 01:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"In achievement of his goal, Shepard resolved not to use his college education, credit history, or any of his previous contacts to help himself. Additionally, he would not beg for money or use services that were not available to others."

Good laugh. So he is able to turn off the education and knowledge that he received and accumulated before this book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.88.181 (talk) 00:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did a Google search and found a book review containing a devastatingly balanced and eloquent critique of the book at the URL < https://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/adam-shepards-scratch-beginnings-is-kind-compassionate-and-naiumlve/Content?oid=1116476 >. I inserted the most salient quote from this review in the article, as well as the URL itself, within a new "Criticism" section that I added to it. I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor and I don't know how to properly wikify all of it, so any assistance in that vein would be appreciated. (I somewhat gauchely included an appeal to the masses to wikify it for me in the article text, itself, so hopefully someone sees that and it does the trick, haha.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.59.44.65 (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scratch Beginnings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100201022906/http://www.lettersonpages.com:80/2008/11/scratch-beginnings-by-adam-shepard/ to http://www.lettersonpages.com/2008/11/scratch-beginnings-by-adam-shepard/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Scratch Beginnings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic style

"You should also read The Book of Story Beginnings. Just a disclaimer, though."
This is so bad, I'm afraid to edit it. I think, however, that it does have some worthy information, so it would better be salvaged.--Adûnâi (talk) 08:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]