Talk:Scott v Shepherd
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Unanswered questions:
1) Why was the squib thrown in the first place?
2) Were there additional criminal charges against Scott? And if so what was their outcome? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.231.27 (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
"De Gray" or "De Grey"?
[edit]The majority held Shepherd was fully liable, because, said De Gray CJ, "I do not consider [the intermediaries] as free agents in the present case, but acting under a compulsive necessity for their own safety and self-preservation." - then later -
De Grey CJ's judgment was as follows....