This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles
User:Tr-browsing keeps on inserting long lists of the subject's gear and food habits. Example [1]. I keep on removing this and left a message on the user's talk page, but it keeps on being reinserted. I feel that this long list is non-encyclopediac and is excessive trivia detail. Thank you --CutOffTies (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That information is relatively unimportant (see WP:TRIVIA) in addition to being almost wholly unsourced. The sources that are provided are claimed to have been accessed in 2008, which cannot be true. Additionally, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (see WP:IINFO #3). Thus, it is my view that this information does not belong in the article per Wikipedia's content guidelines.—Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted some of the edits done today by User:Tr-browsing, here are the explanations:
Personal quotes. Generally, articles about people do not directly quote the person, unless the quotation itself is very-well known. This is following WP:SELFPUB, trying to avoid self-serving material in Wikipedia. I will repeat my concern that User:Tr-browsing seems to be a single-purpose account for only writing an article about Scott Williamson --- this is very likely to be a conflict of interest. This causes me to be doubly-careful about including direct quotes from Mr. Williamson.
External links / references --- the references I removed are already in the reference list: there is no need to repeat them in a separate external link section. I left reference links that are not explicit inline citations.
I am still uneasy about including direct quotes from Mr. Williamson to describe his motivation --- that seems very close to original research based on a primary source. The only saving grace is that the article does make any inference about motivations, but I am not sure that is enough to save it. What do other editors think? —hike395 (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Response to third opinion request: